The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards concern individuals in hospitals and care homes who may need to be deprived of their liberty in order to protect them from serious harm.
It is important to remember that the Safeguards are there to protect very vulnerable people from arbitrary decision making and ensure that they have a voice.
Like other health and care providers, care homes also have a responsibility to promote the independence of each person in their care and to support them in their choices.
Care homes will need to provide additional support to residents who lack the mental capacity to make a decision for themselves. Where they believe a person in their care may be deprived of their liberty, care homes and hospitals are responsible for granting themselves an ‘urgent authorisation’ and applying to the relevant supervisory body for a ‘standard authorisation’, using the standard forms available from the Department of Health:
On March 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its judgement in the case of “P v Cheshire West and Chester Council” and another “P and Q v Surrey County Council”
The Supreme Court has confirmed that to determine whether a person is objectively deprived of their liberty there are two key questions to ask, which they describe as the “acid test”:
Question 01 – Is the person subject to continuous supervision and control?
Question 02 – Is the person free to leave?
(The person may not be saying this or acting on it but the issue is about how staff would react if the person did try to leave.)
This now means that if a person is subject both to continuous supervision and control and not free to leave they are deprived of their liberty.
The following factors are no longer relevant to this:
The Judgement is significant in determining whether arrangements made for the care and/or treatment of an individual lacking capacity to consent to those arrangements amount to a deprivation of liberty.
DOLS applies to anyone…